Contribution and Active Role of Non-Permanent Teachers in Achieving National Education Objectives

Abstract

Non-permanent teachers or GTT are non-government employee who are hired by school principal under working contract. The number of them is gradually increased due to large number of retired teachers and the moratorium policy of government employee recruitment. The role and contribution of non-permanent teachers are shown by their abilities and competencies in teaching content standards, run the standard education process and excel in national competitions. The t-test result of UKG or Teacher Competency Testing results between permanent and non-permanent teachers in Semarang City shows no significant difference. It means both teachers have similar pedagogical and professional competency. Moreover, the non-permanent teachers have filled in the gap of the absence of permanent teachers in some areas. This allows the possibility of having balanced ratio of teachers and students in schools. On the contrary, the existence of non-permanent teachers is a complicated problem in employment system in Indonesia. The trend shows that the job as a non-permanent teacher is now a milestone towards the status of government’s permanent teacher. Therefore, large number of non-permanent teachers and their demand to be recruited as government’s permanent employee have pushed the government to create a policy to fix the problem.

Keywords

Contributions and Roles; Non-Permanent Teachers; National Education Objectives

References

  • Alvares, Sonia, et al. (1998). Cultures of Politics Politics of Cultures Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements. United States of America: Westview Press.
  • Balkis, Astrid Swandira dan Masykur, Achmad Mujab. (2016). Memahami Subjective Well-Being Guru Honorer Sekolah Dasar Negeri (Sebuah Studi Kualitatif Fenomenologis). Empati, April 2016. Volume 5(2), pp. 223-228.
  • Baedhowi. (2009). “Tantangan Profesionalisme Guru pada Era Sertifikasi.” Speech at Professorship ceremony of Human Resources Management at FKIP Universitas Sebelas Maret. Surakarta, November 12th, 2009.
  • Budiardjo, Miriam. (2008). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  • Creswell, John. W. (2014). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  • Darmaningtyas. (2015). Pendidikan yang Memiskinkan (Edisi Revisi). Yogyakarta: Intrans Publishing.
  • Diener, E. (2009). Assessing subjective well-being: progress and opportunities.E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of E. Diener,Social Indicators Research Series 39, doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4 3.
  • Diener, E. (2009). Subjective well-being.E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being: The collected works of E. Diener, Social Indicator Research Series 37, doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6 2.
  • Fitriyah, Lailatul. dan Jauhar, Muhammad. (2016). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakarya.
  • Freedman, Lawrence. (2013). Strategy A History. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Fullan, M. (2001). The New Meaning of Educational Vhange. Toronto: Irwin Publishing.
  • Gaffar, Afan.(1999). Politik Indonesia. Transisi Menuju Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  • Handoyo, Eko. (2012). Kebijakan Publik. Semarang: Widya Karya.
  • Indiahono, Dwiyanto. (2009). Kebijakan Publik Berbasis Dynamic Policy Analisys. Yogyakarta: Gava Media
  • Learning: The Treasure Within. (1996). Report to UNESCO of The International Commission of Education for Twenty-First Century.
  • Mahmud dan Suntana, Ija. (2012). Antropologi Pendidikan. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.
  • Mulyasa. (2013). Menjadi guru profesional. Bandung: RemajaRosdakarya.
  • Oman, Sukmana. (2016). Konsep dan Teori Gerakan Sosial., Malang: Intrans Publishing.
  • Ranjabar, Jacobus. (2015). Perubahan Sosial Teori-Teori Dan Proses Perubahan Sosial Serta Teori Pembangunan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  • Sarwono, Jonathan. (2013). Strategi Melakukan Riset Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Gabungan. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
  • Schimmack. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. Journal of the science of subjective well-being, 228, 97-123.
  • Soekanto, Soerjono. (2003). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
  • Soekidjo, Notoadmodjo. (2007). Promosi Kesehatan Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  • Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  • Sutopo, H, B. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar Teori dan Terapannya Dalam Penelitian. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
  • Synder, C. R.& Lopez, S. (2002). Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698//tech1315136