Competency profile of junior high school teachers in developing high-level science thinking questions


The aim of this research was for descript about skill profile of Junior High School teachers in developed high-order Science thinking questions. It was quantitative descriptive research for Junior High School teachers from East Indonesia. Data was a collected of questions that the teacher made for five working days in the technical guidance activities. Data was analyzed by quantitative descriptive refers to criteria of cognitive levels and rules for wrote the right questions. Results of this research were 71% was higher order thinking question at the implementation level, 61% at the analysis level, 53% at the evaluation level and 38% at the creative level. Based upon the rules for wrote the right question only 54% that met the criteria for wrote the right questions.


Competency of Junior High School teachers, high-level thinking questions, Science


  • Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42 (2), 233–250.
  • Altun, M., & Akkaya, R. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ comments on PISA math questions and our country’s students’ low achievement levels. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29 (1), 19–34.
  • Anderson, O. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
  • Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing instructional design to improve mathematical higher order thinking skills of students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 1–7.
  • Bialik, M., Bogan, M., Fadel, C., & Horvathova, M. (2015). Education for the 21st century: What should students learn? Center for Curriculum Redesign, 3 (4), 415–420. Retrieved from
  • Didis, M. G., Erbas, A. K., Cetinkaya, B., Cakiroglu, E., & Alacaci, C. (2016). Exploring prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ interpretation of student thinking through analyzing students’ work in modelling. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28 (3), 349–378.
  • Djidu, H., & Jailani. (2016). Activity in mathematics teaching and learning that fostering students’ higher order thinking skills. In A. W. Kurniasih, B. E. Susilo, & M. Kharis (Eds.), Mathematics National Seminar 10th Proceeding, (pp. 367–376). Semarang: Mathematics and Social Science Faculty.
  • Bialik, M., Bogan, M., Fadel, C., & Horvathova, M. (2015). Education for the 21st century: What should students learn? Center for Curriculum Redesign, 3 (4), 415–420. Retrieved from
  • Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD
  • Creswell, W. J.(2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research 4th edition. Boston: Pearson.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • OECD. (2013). PISA Result (Volume V): Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems. Paris : OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2014). PISA Results (Volume IV): What students know and can do – student performance in mathematics, reading and science. Paris : PISA OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2016). PISA Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, Paris : OECD Publishing.
  • Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37 (4), 353–369.
  • Orlich, D., Harder, R., Callahan, R., Trevisan, M., & Brown, A. (2010). Teaching strategies: A guide to effective instruction. Boston, MA: Wadstworth.
  • Pangestika, R., & Alfarisa,A. (2015). Pendidikan profesi guru (PPG) : Strategi pengembangan profesionalitas guru dan peningkatan mutu pendidikan indonesia. Naskah Prosiding Seminar Nasional di Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
  • Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2016). Vocational high school teachers’ difficulties in implementing the assessment in curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 9 (1), 33–48.
  • Stahnke, R., Schueler, S., & Roesken-Winter, B. (2016). Teachers’ perception, interpretation, and decision-making: A systematic review of empirical mathematics education research. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48 (1–2), 1–27.
  • Thomas, A., & Thorne, G. (2009). How to increase higher order thinking. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from
  • Scott, L. A. (2017). 21st century skills early learning framework. Partnership for 21st Century Skill (P21). Retrieved from P21_ELF_ Framework_Final.pdf.
  • Sajidan, S. Widoretno, M. Ramli, Joko A. (2015). Kualitas Dan Kuantitas Pertanyaan Guru Dan Peserta Didik Sebagai Indikator Proses Berpikir Pada Pembelajaran Biologi Di SMA Surakarta. Laporan Akhir (unpublished)
  • Tuckman, W. B. & Harper, E. B. (2012). Conducting educational research. USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
  • Wang, J.-Y., Wu, H.-K., Chien, S. P., Hwang, F. K., & Hsu, Y. S. (2015). Designing Apps for science learning: Facilitating high school students’ conceptual understanding by using tablet PCs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(4), 441-458.
  • Watson, J. M., Collis, K. F., Callingham, R. A., & Moritz, J. B. (1995). A model for assessing higher order thinking in statistics. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1 (3), 247–275.