Content Analysis of the Pancasila Education Curriculum in Preventing LGBT Behavior

Isnarmi Moeis(1), Junaidi Indrawadi(2), Nurman S(3), Zaky Farid Luthfi(4)
  • (1) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • (2) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • (3) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • (4) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

Abstract

LGBT is a phenomenon of deviant social behavior which becomes a moral threat in Indonesia. Besides, it also threatens. This article aims to analyze the relevance of Pancasila values contained in the curriculum of Pancasila Education Courses in Higher Education. Pancasila course is one of the compulsory subjects that contains the noble values of the nation as a way to foster student morale. This research uses content analysis which sorts out and encodes the content contained in the curriculum and then compire with theory relevantly. The results showed that around 40% of the contents of the Pancasila Education curriculum were relevant for integrating anti-LGBT values. There are two materials that have relevance including Pancasila as an ideology and philosophical system.

Keywords

Pancasila education, anti LGBT, model of teaching

References

  • Adamczyk, A., & Pitt, C. (2009). Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: The role of religion and cultural context. Social Science Research, 38(2), 338-351.
  • Boellstorff, T. (2005). Between religion and desire: Being Muslim and gay in Indonesia. American Anthropologist, 107(4), 575-585.
  • Bouhdiba, Abdelwahab 1998 Sexuality in Islam. Alan Sheridan, trans. Los Angeles: Saqi Books.
  • Brown, S. C., & Kysilka, M. L. (2002). Applying multicultural and global concepts in the classroom and beyond. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
  • Chesire, H. (2016) ‘From_Bob_Jones_to_Obergefell:What the History of the Gay Right Movement Means for the Future of Religious Tax-Exemption’, Law and Psychology Review, 40, p. 383.
  • Clucas, R. (2017). Sexual orientation change efforts, conservative Christianity and resistance to sexual justice. Social Sciences, 6(2), 54.
  • Crandall, C., & Eshleman A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414- 446.
  • Davy, Z., Amsler, S. and Duncombe, K. (2015) ‘Facilitating LGBT Medical, Health and Social Care Content in Higher Education Teaching’, Qualitative Research in Education, 4(2), p. 134. doi: 10.17583/qre.2015.1210.
  • Dedeoglu, H., Ulusoy, M., & Lamme, L. L. (2012). Turkish preservice teachers’ Perceptions of children's picture books reflecting LGBT-related issues. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(4), 256-263.
  • Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S.T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4thed., pp. 269-322). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Fiske, S., & Taylor S. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Frank, G. (2013) ‘“The Civil Rights of Parents”: Race and Conservative Politics in Anita Bryant’s Campaign against Gay Rights in 1970s Florida’, Journal of the History of Sexuality, 22(1), pp. 126–160. doi: 10.7560/JHS22106.
  • Harahap (2016) ‘LGBT di Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum Islam, HAM, Psikologi dan Pendekatan Maṣlaḥah’, Al-Ahkam, 26(2), pp. 223–248.
  • Hartanto (2016) ‘Hegemoni dalam Emansipatory : Studi Kasus Advokasi Legalisasi Lesbian , Gay , Biseksual , dan Transgender’, Indonesian Perspective, 1(2), pp. 31–47.
  • Khanis, S. (2013) ‘Human Rights and the LGBTI Movement in Indonesia’, Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 19(1), pp. 127–138. doi: 10.1080/12259276.2013.11666145.
  • Khanis, S. (2013). Human rights and the LGBTI movement in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 19(1), 127-138.
  • Kruglanski, A., & Higgins, T. (2003). Social psychology: A general reader. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Manalastas, E. J., Ojanen, T. T., Torre, B. A., Ratanashevorn, R., Hong, B. C. C., Kumaresan, V., & Veeramuthu, V. (2017). Homonegativity in Southeast Asia: Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 17(1), 25-33.
  • Mertus, J. (2007). The rejection of human rights framings: The case of LGBT advocacy in the US. Human Rights Quarterly, 1036-1064.
  • Mosse, George (1985) Nationalism and Sexuality: Middle-Class Morality and Sexual Norms in Modern Europe. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Musti’ah (2016) ‘Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender (Lgbt): Pandangan Islam, Faktor Penyebab, Dan Solusinya’, Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial, 3(2), pp. 262–263.
  • Muttaqin, I. (2017) ‘Membaca Strategi Eksistensi LGBT di Indonesia’, Raheema, 3(1). doi: 10.24260/raheema.v3i1.562.
  • Oetomo, D. and Suvianita, K. (2014) ‘Hidup Sebagai LGBT di Asia Laporan Nasional Indonesia’.Available at: https://www.id.undp.org/content/dam/indonesia/docs/LGBT/Indonesia report 27 May 14_ID_FINAL_Bahasa.pdf.
  • Pearce, J. and Cumming-Potvin, W. (2017) ‘English classrooms and curricular justice for the recognition of LGBT individuals: What can teachers do?’, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(9), pp. 77–92. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2017v42n9.5.
  • Ridwan, R., & Wu, J. (2018). ‘Being young and LGBT, what could be worse?’Analysis of youth LGBT activism in Indonesia: challenges and ways forward. Gender & Development, 26(1), 121-138.
  • Robinson, C. M., & Spivey, S. E. (2007). The politics of masculinity and the ex-gay movement. Gender & Society, 21(5), 650-675.
  • Rondahl, G. (2009). Students' inadequate knowledge about lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons. International journal of nursing education scholarship, 6(1).
  • Soboleva, I. V and Bakhmetjev, Y. A. (2015) ‘Political Awareness and Self-Blame in the Explanatory Narratives of LGBT People Amid the Anti-LGBT Campaign in Russia’, Sexuality and Culture, 19(2), pp. 275–296. doi: 10.1007/s12119-014-9268-8.
  • Stakic, I. (2011). Homophobia and hate speech in Serbian public discourse: how nationalist myths and stereotypes influence prejudices against the LGBT minority (Master's thesis, Universitetet i Tromsø).
  • Sulis Winurini (2016) ‘Memaknai Perilaku LGBT di Indonesia (Tinjauan Psikologi Abnormal)’, Jurnal Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI, VIII(05), pp. 9–12.
  • Sumerau, J. E. (2016) ‘They just don’t stand for nothing: LGBT Christians’ definitions of non-religious others’, Secularism and Nonreligion, 5(8), pp. 1–12. doi: 10.5334/snr.19.
  • Underwood, A. (2011) ‘The Politics of Pride: The LGBT Movement and Post-Soviet Democracy’, Harvard International Review, 33, 1.
  • Wilton, T. (2000). Sexualities in health and social care – A textbook. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  • Yep, G. (2003). The violence of heteronormativity in communication studies: Notes on injury, healing, and queer world-making. Journal of Homosexuality, 45, 11-59.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/GCS-PSSHERS360

Progress in Social Science, Humanities and Education Research Symposium

Progress in Social Science, Humanities and Education Research Symposium

Redwhite Press

2685-5984

2685-5933

2020

© 2024 GCI, Global Conferences Series, Lda - All rights reserved.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.