History learning in senior high school: analysis of rpp based on permendikbud number 22 of 2016

Abstract

This study focuses on analyzing lesson plans as a learning tool for class X history teachers based on Permendikbud no. 22 of 2016 in KD 3.1 "Understanding the concepts of chronological, diachronic, synchronic, space, and time thinking in history". This study uses the main data source, namely 5 lesson plans for history teachers with the type of research library research (library study) using the content analysis method. Sources of secondary data obtained from library materials in the form of books, journals, theses, and articles that are relevant to this research. The data collection technique used is to collect library materials on an ongoing basis with the object of discussion being studied. The data analysis technique is using the method of content analysis (content analysis). The results showed that the RPP components made by history teachers in SMA/MA/SMK were based on the completeness of the components and the systematic preparation of the RPP components, namely the five RPPs did not yet have conformity with the RPP compiled based on Permendikbud No. 22 of 2016. The results of the analysis of RPP content components, namely, RPP I and RPP V are not appropriate in terms of objectives, steps and assessment of learning outcomes, although there are several content components that refer to the components formulated. RPP II does not yet have conformity, it can be seen in the unclear learning resources, the material is not attached and the objectives are not based on KD. RPP III in the appropriate category can be seen from the objectives and assessments, but there are discrepancies in the steps of learning activities. RPP IV is not appropriate, discrepancies are seen in the learning objectives that have not been formulated based on KD, the assessment has not covered the assessed aspects, but there is conformity in the steps of learning activities.