Prospective teacher’s ability to design blended learning based lesson plan

Abstract

This study aims to review the implementation of “pengembangan program pembelajaran Fisika (P3F)” courses as an effort to prepare prospective teacher students as professional teachers who can develop good learning plans. The research method uses qualitative methods which are carried out in 3 main stages: 1) pre-field, 2) field, and 3) data processing. The result of data processing is in the form of narrative research result. The research sample was taken from 6 students who took P3F lectures with purposive sampling technique. The result showed that the implementation on P3F lectures during distance learning mostly carried out via zoom meetings and discussions through Wag. It was able to facilitate the delivery of information about the development of learning programs needed by prospective teacher. On the other hands student readiness in developing science learning program, especially in terms of the ability to make lesson plans, compile teaching materials, choose learning media, develop student workshoots and develop assessment instruments, there are still many possibilities for improvement, especially related to developing blended learning-based lesson plans. This result then become an input that the implementation of the next P3F lecture should be done by increasing the amount of time to provide feedback on the design that have been made by prospective teacher students.

Keywords

Prospective teachers, development of learning courses, lessons plans

References

  • Adi, Y. K., & Widodo, A. (2018). Pemahaman Hakikat Sains Pada Guru Dan Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Edukasi: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Artikel Pendidikan, 10(1), 55–72.
  • Dowling, N. L., & McKinnon, S. H. (2002). Instructional objectives. Professional Safety, 47(9), 41.
  • Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
  • Evitasari, A. D., Musyadad, F., & Sholihah, F. (2021). Kesesuaian Rpp Tematik Integratif Dengan Surat Edaran Nomor 14 TahuN 2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 18–34.
  • Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, 1, 3–21.
  • Jannah, N. R. (2021). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Metode Blended Learning. Prosiding Pendidikan Profesi Guru Agama Islam (PPGAI), 1(1), 1502–1510.
  • Mayudana, I., & Sukendra, I. K. (2020). Analisis kebijakan penyederhanaan RPP: Surat edaran menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan nomor 14 tahun 2019. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development, 1(1), 62–70.
  • Nafis, M. M. (2011). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Teras.
  • Permendikbud, No. 22. (2016). Tahun 2016. Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah Yang Memuat Tentang Tingkat Kompetensi Dan Kompetensi Inti Sesuai Dengan Jenjang Dan Jenis Pendidika Tertentu.
  • Permendikbud, No. 103. (2014). 103 Tahun 2014. Pembelajaran Pada Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pendidikan Menengah.
  • Ruhimat, T. (2021). PROSEDUR PEMBELAJARAN.
  • Rumini, R. (2021). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Ppkn Materi Analisis Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Melalui Model Blended Learning Berbantuan Media Whatsapp. Janacitta, 4(2).
  • Sari, M. (2019). Analisis Model-model Blended Learning di Lembaga Pendidikan. NATURAL SCIENCE: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Dan Pendidikan IPA, 5(2), 835–847.
  • Saryono, A. (2010). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif dalam bidang kesehatan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika, 98–99.
  • Sjukur, S. B. (2012). Pengaruh blended learning terhadap motivasi belajar dan hasil belajar siswa di tingkat SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 2(3).
  • Suryana, A. (2007). Tahap-Tahapan Penelitian Kualitatif. Diktat Kuliah Pada.
  • Yulianti, Y. A., & Wulandari, D. (2021). Flipped Classroom: Model Pembelajaran untuk Mencapai Kecakapan Abad 21 Sesuai Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(2), 372–384.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/icie549