Ex post evaluation methods in evaluation research: a conceptual study

Irfan Abraham; Yusdan Ibnuza Mahany

doi:10.32698/icie562

Ex post evaluation methods in evaluation research: a conceptual study

Irfan Abraham^(1*), Yusdan Ibnuza Mahany⁽²⁾

(1) Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Evaluation research currently has a very large influence on the sustainability of a program. This is because evaluation research can provide recommendations to policy makers whether the program is continued or not. There are three types of program evaluation, namely evaluation before the program is implemented, evaluation when the program is implemented and evaluation after the program is completed. Evaluations that are carried out after the program is finished are known as ex post evaluations. Several research results provide examples of how powerful the results/impact of ex post evaluation research are. The strength of the ex-post evaluation method is because this method is more able to measure the impact of the program as a whole and measurably. Intact in the sense that the program and all its tools have been completed. Measurable in the sense that the impact of the program can be measured through a certain instrument. This literature study aims to provide convenience for the audience to understand the evaluation research, the ex-post evaluation method, and the purpose of the ex-post evaluation.

Keywords

Evaluative research, ex post evaluation, evaluation

References

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 39, Pub. L. No. 39 (2006).
Arikunto, S. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Aritonang, Y. M. K., Sandy, I. A., & Anggadipura, F. (2012). PERANcangan sistem evaluasi kegiatan belajar mengajar di jurusan teknik industri universitas katolik parahyangan. Reserach Report - Enginering Science, 1. https://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/rekayasa/article/view/269
Bappenas. (2009). Pedoman evaluasi kinerja pembangunan sektoral. Deputi Bidang Evaluasi Kinerja Pembangunan.
D.B Yarbrough, Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2010). The Program Evaluation Standards (3rd Editio). Sage Publications CA: Los Angeles, CA.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Corwin Press, Inc.
Kantun, S. (2017). Penelitian Evaluatif Sebagai Salah Satu Model Penelitian Dalam Bidang Pendidikan (Suatu Kajian Konseptual). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial, 10(2), 1–15.
Kawengian, D. D. V., & Rares, J. J. (2015). Evaluasi Kebijakan Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Perdagangan Manusia (Trafficking) Terutama Perempuan Dan Anak Di Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Acta Diurna, IV(5). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/actadiurnakomunikasi/article/view/9879/9464
Kuldeep mathur, & Inayatullah. (1980). Monitoring and evaluation of rural development : Some Asian experiences. Ed. by Kuldeep Mathur and Inayatullah. Kuala Lumpur : Asian and Pacific Development Administration Centre.
Lopez, K. (2014). The lack of ex-post project evaluation at the World Bank: One has no power. Valuing Voices. https://valuingvoices.com/category/uncategorized/
OECD.org. (2014). Ex-post Evaluation Report on the Project for Improving Heat Supply System in Khorezm Uzbekistan. Koica. https://www.oecd.org/derec/korea/publicationsdocuments/all/2/
Rons, N., Bruyn, A. De, & Cornelis, J. (2008). Research evaluation per discipline: A peer-review method and its outcomes. Research Evaluation, 17(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3152/095820208X240208
Stevenson, E. (2015). C.I.P.P Evaluation Model. SMCC-ICT. http://smcc-ict.weebly.com/blog-11-its/cipp-evaluation-model
Wirawan. (2011). Evaluasi : Teori, Model, Metodologi, Standar, Aplikasi dan Profesi (3rd ed.). Rajawali Grafindo.

Proceeding:

2nd UIN Imam Bonjol International Conference on Islamic Education

Publisher:

Redwhite Press

ISSN (Print):

2685-5984

ISSN (Electronic):

2685-5933

Published:

December 2021