Investigating the e-learning in senior high school of Pariaman city

Azrul Azrul(1*), Ulfia Rahmi(2)
  • (1) Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol, Padang, Indonesia
  • (2) Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The application of e-learning by optimizing the internet offers advantages, such as flexibility in space and time, the availability of extensive learning resources and undemanding access. However, behind these advantages, the use of the internet in learning raises some problems, for instance the emergence of negative links, content that is not relevant to teaching material, and data security. In addition, the success of implementing e-learning is also determined by the user, namely the teacher and students. This study is purposed to reveal accurate data about it through the distribution of questionnaires that reveal about e-learning supporting facilities including computer devices and internet networks, users capabilities, and characteristics of students. Data is collected through interviews with teachers, observing facilities that support e-learning program, and the distribution of questionnaires to students of sehior high school in Pariaman city of West Sumatera, Indonesia. The results of this study show that the schools are ready to organize e-learning, but to overcome the problems that arise are required internet based e-learning.

Keywords

E-learning, internet, characteristics of students, instructional

References

  • Control. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 12(1), 13–38.
  • Azrul, A., Rukun, K., & Darmansyah, D. (2019). The Relationship Between Internal Locus Control And Students Perception Toward E-Learning in Biology Subject in Senior High School. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 14(2), 262-266.
  • Azrul, A., & Rahmi, U. (2021). Pengembangan Konten E-Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Pembelajaran Bermakna di Sekolah Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Bahana Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(2), 154-161.
  • Brown, A. H., & Green, T. D. (2015). The essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice. Routledge.
  • Cakir, M. (2017). Investigating Prospective Teachers’ Perceived Problem-Solving Abilities in Relation to Gender, Major, Place Lived, and Locus of Control. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(6), 1030–1038.
  • Chaeruman, U. (2010). E-learning dalam pendidikan jarak jauh. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.
  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design, Qualitatif, Quantitative, and Mixing Approaches. London: Sage.
  • Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Effendi, M; Effendi, H; Effendi, H. (2017). The Role of Locus Control And Learning Styles in the Development of the Blended Learning Model at PSU. International Journal of GEOMATE, 13(37), 75–80. Retrieved from http://www.geomatejournal.com/articles/2017/13/37
  • Eremias, L., & Subash, R. (2013). E-content development: A milestone in the dynamic progress of elearning. International Journal of Teacher Educational Research (IJTER), 2(1), 1–5.
  • FitzPatrick, T. (2012). Key Success Factors of eLearning in Education: A Professional Development Model to Evaluate and Support eLearning. Online Submission.
  • Forte, A. (2005). Locus of control and the moral reasoning of managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1–3), 65–77.
  • Horton, W. (2012). E-Learning by Design (2nd ed.). San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Hsia, J.-W., Chang, C.-C., & Tseng, A.-H. (2014). Effects of individuals’ locus of control and computer self-efficacy on their e-learning acceptance in high-tech companies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(1), 51–64.
  • Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2013). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context. Computers & Education, 62, 149–158.
  • Khan, B. H. (2005). Managing E-Learning Strategies : Design, Delivery, Implementation and Evaluation. Hershey: Idea Group Inc. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-634-1
  • Kong, S.-C., Looi, C.-K., Chan, T.-W., & Huang, R. (2017). Teacher development in Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Beijing for e-Learning in school education. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(1), 5–25.
  • Manichander, T. (2014). Locus of Control and Performance: Widening Applicabilities. Online Submission, 3(2), 84–86.
  • Marsh, I. (2017). A lightweight measurement platform for home internet monitoring. In IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops, 2017 (pp. 1–2). IEEE.
  • Masoumi, D. (2010). Critical factors for effective eLearning. Goteburg University.
  • Munir. (2009). Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Bandung: ALFABETA.
  • Mupinga, D. M., Nora, R. T., & Yaw, D. C. (2006). The learning styles, expectations, and needs of online students. College Teaching, 54(1), 185–189.
  • Naidu, S. (2006). E-learning: A guidebook of principles, procedures and practices. Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia (CEMCA).
  • Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory.
  • Prawiradilaga, D. S. (2016). Mozaik Teknologi Pendidikan: E-Learning. Kencana.
  • Rahmi, U., Mawardi Effendi, Z., & Ansyar, M. (2017). The Development of Message-Design Model in Blended Learning. The Asian Journal of Technology Management, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.12695/ajtm.2017.10.1.1
  • Rios, T., Elliott, M., & Mandernach, B. J. (2018). Efficient Instructional Strategies for Maximizing Online Student Satisfaction. The Journal of Educators Online, 15(3).
  • Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: building successful online learning in your organization. McGrow Hill, New York, NY, USA.
  • Santoso, H. B., Batuparan, A. K., Isal, R. Y. K., & Goodridge, W. H. (2018). The Development of A Learning Dashboard for Lecturer; A Case Study on A Student-Centered E-Learning Environment. The Journal of Educators Online, 15(1).
  • Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2014). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. In Applications of flow in human development and education (pp. 475–494). Springer.
  • Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2014). Instructional technology & media for learning: Teknologi pembelajaran dan media untuk belajar. Prenada Media.
  • Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., Russell, J. D., & Mims, C. (2008). Instructional technology and media for learning.
  • Steele, J., & Holbeck, R. (2018). Five Elements that Impact Quality Feedback in the Online Asynchronous Classroom. The Journal of Educators Online, 15(3).

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/icie565

2nd UIN Imam Bonjol International Conference on Islamic Education

2nd UIN Imam Bonjol International Conference on Islamic Education

Redwhite Press

2685-5984

2685-5933

December 2021

© 2024 GCI, Global Conferences Series, Lda - All rights reserved.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.