The sociopolitical development of veiled women human rights perspective

Abstract

In the midst of the strengthening sense of religiousness in the use of the veil for women, social and political developments also increasingly provide space for veiled women. This article aims to explore the sociopolitical developments for veiled women from a human rights perspective. The data obtained from observations, interviews, and literature studies were analyzed using sociology of religion. This investigation consisted of 20 in-depth interviews with veiled women and the people of Palangka Raya. The article is based on an argument that, from a human rights perspective, veiled women have the right to apply their religious rules in their daily lives. The findings of this study show that social treatment is influenced by people's knowledge of religious rules regarding the wearing of the veil. The political treatment is the attitude of the state that protects its citizens to practice their religious beliefs. Urban communities are more tolerant of veiled women than rural communities. Social treatment of veiled women is more based on the culture of Indonesian women's dress. Changes in social treatment experienced by veiled women because they display good morals (attitude), thus changing the negative view of the veiled woman.

Keywords

Veiled women, sociopolitic, human rights

References

  • Berg, L., & Lundahi, M. (2017). (Un-) veiling the west: Burkini-gate, princess hijab and dressing as struggle for postsecular integration. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 8(3).
  • Bjoernaas, T. I. (2015). Saving Muslim women: A feminist-postcolonial critique of veiling legislation in Norway. Islamophobia Studies Journal, 3(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.13169/islastudj.3.1.0078
  • Breams, E., & et al. (2014). The Belgian “Burqa Ban” confronted with insider realities. In The experiences of face veil wearers in Europe and the law 77 (pp. 96–101).
  • Costello, R. Á., & Ahmed, S. (2023). Citizenship, Identity, and veiling: Interrogating the limits of article 8 of the European convention on human rights in cases involving the religious dress of Muslim women. Journal of Law and Religion, 38(1), 81–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2022.58
  • Fathzadeh, F. (2022). Swapping the veil for casual clothing: A study of Iranian immigrant women living in Norway. Women’s Studies International Forum, 92, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102577
  • Gulik, G. van. (2009). Headscarves: The wrong battle.
  • Iqbal, M. M. (2023). The life of the niqab and sirwal phenomenological study of family power relations to stigma. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama, 17(1), 33–40.
  • Paul, K. (2024). Banning Islamic veils: Is social cohesion (or living together) a valid argument? Journal of Law and Religion, 39(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2024.2
  • Pazhoohi, F. (2024). Reputation-surveillance model of mate guarding: community size and religious veiling. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 6. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2024.40

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/aicoiis24620