The Role of Supervision in Actualizing Good and Clean Governance

Muhammad Akbal(1*), the Word Umar(2)
  • (1) Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • (2) Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This research aims to examine the policies and the roles of government supervision of Makassar city in actualizing good and clean governance. This research was normative law-sociological research. The location of the research was at Inspectorate and Regional House of Representatives in Makassar City. The techniques of collecting data were interviews and documentation. The technique of analysis data was descriptive qualitative. The research result: (1) the policy conducted by local government of Makassar City namely, roadmap for bureaucratic reform government of Makassar City Year 2015-2019; encourages work performance of Local Government Work Unit in giving service to the society and conduct measurements performance to increase work accountability for each Local Government Work Unit; and 2) the roles of government supervision of Makassar city was done, through by Makassar Inspectorate as 'internal supervisor', meanwhile Regional House of Representatives as 'external supervisor'. In addition, supervision also involves public participation.

Keywords

Actualizing good and clean governance

References

  • Gianluca, M., et al. (2011). A multi-level framework for ICT-enabled governance: assessing the non-technical dimensions of 'government openness, Electronic Journal of e-Government, 9(2), 152 – 165.
  • Haque, P., & Pathrannarakul, P. (2013). E-government towards good governance: A global appraisal. Journal of E-Governance, 36(1), 25–34.
  • Holliday, I., & Yep, R. (2005). E-government in China. Public Administration and Development, 25(3), 239-249.
  • IOS Press. (2005). The role of e-government in Europe’s future. The Journal of E-Government Policy and Regulation, 28(1), 59-68.
  • Indonesia Internet Service Provider Association, (2017). Inforgrafis: Penetrasi dan Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia, diakses melalui: https://web.kominfo.go.id/sites/default/files/Laporan%20Survei%20APJII_2017_v1.3.pdf
  • International, Transparency. (2018). Corruption Perception Index 2018. Diakses melalui situs: https://www.transparency.org/files/content/pages/2018_CPI_Executive_Summary.pdf
  • Kernaghan, K. (2008) Integrating Service Delivery: Barriers and Benchmarks. Toronto: Institute for Citizen-centred Service.
  • Kernaghan, K. (2009) Moving towards integrated public governance: improving service delivery through community engagement. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol 75, Issue 2 pp. 239-254.
  • Kettani, D., et al. (2008). Proposition of a method for the development and deployment of e-government systems that emphasize good governance. Proceeding of International MCETECH Conference on e-Technologies, IEEE. DOI 10.1109.
  • Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (2017). Survei Penilaian Integritas, disampaikan dalam acara sosialisasi program penilaian integritas pada Kementerian/Lembaga/Pemerintah Daerah, 21 November 2018. Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kedeputian Bidang Pencegahan.
  • Khan, M. 2013. E-government, GIS and good governance. Public management, 95(1), 18-23.
  • Mucavele, F. (2003). Improving the investment climate through e-government and e-land registry in Mozambique. In Proceeding of global forum on international investment; OECD: Johannesburg. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investmentstatisticsandanalysis/21002025.pdf
  • Pillay, S. (2004). Corruption: the challenge to good governance; a South African perspective. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(7), 586-605.
  • Rana, N., et al. (2011). Reflecting on e-government research: Toward taxonomy of theories and theoretical constructs. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 7(4), 64-88
  • Republik Indonesia, Ombudsman. (2017). Laporan Hasil Insiatif Ombudsman: Kepatuhan Penyelenggara Negara terhadap pemenuhan komponen Standar Pelayanan Sesuai Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta.
  • Republik Indonesia, Ombudsman. (2018). Ringkasan Eksekutif Hasil Penilaian Kepatuhan Penyelenggara terhadap Pemenuhan Komponen Standar Pelayanan Sesuai Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta.
  • Tolbert, C., & Mossberg, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 302–478.
  • UNESCAP. (2012). What is good governance? United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved March 9, 2019 from www.uniscap.org/huest/gg/governance.htm
  • West, D. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public administration review, 64(1), 15-27.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/hum0212

International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities

International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities

RedWhite Press

2685-5976

2685-5941

2019

© 2023 GCI, Global Conferences Series, Lda - All rights reserved.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.