EXO OLO TASK Learning Model: What Should Students Do in The Class?

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to describe the EXO OLO TASK Learning Model as a learning model that can develop variative and creative learning activities. This model is also relevant to the 21st century learning skills and Curriculum 2013 learning. This article is a conceptual idea based on underlying theories and concepts and supported by empirical data because it was developed in dissertation research using the ADDIE development model. This model has four syntaxes, namely, 1) strengthening concepts, 2) EXO TASK, 3) OLO TASK, 4) Reflection. The advantages of this learning model are: 1) can develop creativity, critical thinking, communication and collaboration and higher-order thinking skills of students as the core of 21st century learning, 2) can develop higher quality learning activities and more complete learning experiences, 3) the multilevel and challenging questions is the trigger for the expected learning activity. The application of this learning model can help teachers to answer basic questions about 21st century learning that is "what should students do at class?"

Keywords

EXO OLO TASK Learning Model, HOTS, learning activity, learning skills

References

  • Ansyar, Mohamad. 2015. Kurikulum (Hakikat, Fondasi, Desain dan Pengembangan). Jakarta. Kencana Prenadamedia Group
  • Aoun, J.E. (2017). Robot-proof: higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. US: MIT Press.
  • Bialik & Fadel. 2015. Skill for the 21st Century;What Should Students Learn?. Centre for Curriculum Redesign. www.curriculumredesign.org
  • Brandt, Ronald D & Tyler, Ralph W. 2007. Goals and Objectives In Contemporary Issues in Curriculum. Allan C. Orsnstein, Edward F Pajak, & Stacy B Ornstein (Eds). Boston;Pearson Education, Inc, 6-12
  • Gredler, E. 2011. Learning and Instruction: Teori dan Aplikasi (Edisi Keenam). Kencana Prenada Media Group: Jakarta.
  • Hamalik, Omar. 2010. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta
  • Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Stanne, M. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis
  • Miller, C., & Ahmad, Y. (2000). Collaboration and partnership: an effective response to complexity and fragmentation or solution built on sand? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 20(5/6), 1-38.
  • N Nofrion et al. 2018. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.145 012038
  • Nofrion, N; Wijayanto, Bayu. Learning Activities In Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Oriented Learning Context. Geosfera Indonesia, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 122-130, aug. 2018. ISSN 2614-8528.
  • Nofrion, N. (2018, October 14). Panduan Pelaksanaan Model Pembelajaran Exo Olo Task (Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (HOTS) Dalam Pembelajaran). https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/wh2mp
  • Ornstein, Allan C & Hunkins, Francis, P. 2013. Curriculum; Foundation, Principles and Issues. Boston;Pearson
  • Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge, 33-47.
  • Philips, R. W. 2004. Skinner’s Science Of Dental Material. 9th ed. Philadelphia : W.B. Saunders Co.
  • Richey et al. 2011. The Instructional Design Knowledge Base; Theory, Research and Practise. New York;Routledge
  • Slavin, Robert E. 1994. Educational Psychology:Theory and Practice. Boston:Allyn and Bacon
  • Schunk, Dale H. 2012. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, Fifth Edition. New Jersey:Pearson Prentice Hall
  • Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. Anchor Books: USA
  • Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world Problem1. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447-504

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/hum0216