Implementation of Teach Programs in The Mathematical Pedagogy to The Students with Autism

Abstract

Various efforts have been made by the Ministry of Education Malaysia to improve the quality of education of special needs students for the survival of this group. Among them is the TEACCH Program introduced for autism students. The objective of this study was to look at the impact of the TEACCH Program on mathematical pedagogy on autism students. This study used qualitative methods involving observation, document analysis and interviews. The study respondents consisted of eight students with autism (learning problems) from a school under Kinta North PPD. The specific infrastructure requirements for autism students as suggested in the TEACCH program have been applied by creating a special room by the school concerned. The study focuses on the subject of mathematics. In terms of pedagogy, BBM mathematics subjects have been built on simple, medium and hard levels. The BBM layout from simple to complex has been systematically applied by the responsible teacher. The study is conducted for one year throughout 2019. The findings of the study show that the TEACCH program greatly helps autism students improve their skills in managing themselves with the environment as well as mastering math skills as found in the standardized Curriculum and Assessment Document.

Keywords

TEACCH Program; Special education; autism; mathematics

References

  • ADDM (Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring). Diperoleh daripada https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/addm.html pada 1 Februari 2020
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50,179-211.
  • Aney Marinda Muhammad Amin & Norasmah Othman,2019. Pengurusan Bilik Darjah Guru Baharu yang Mengikuti Program Pembangunan Guru Baharu (PPGB). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 44(1)(2019): 21-27. doI:http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JPEN-2019-44.01-03
  • Autism Society of America. Diperoleh daripada http://www.autism-society.org pada 1 Februari 2020.
  • Choong Lean Keow. (2009). Pengurusan Bilik Darjah dan Tingkah Laku. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd.
  • Dantini Ak Juring. (2011). Aplikasi teknik modifikasi tingkah laku dalam pengurusan tingkah laku murid bermasalah pembelajaran. Unpublished degree thesis, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
  • G.B. Mesibov (1997). Formal and informal measures on the effectiveness of the TEACCH programme. Autism, 1 (1997), pp. 25-35.
  • K. A. Razhiyah. (2005). Menjadi Guru Pendidikan Khas. Bentong: PTS Profesional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.
  • Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2004). Huraian sukatan pelajaran pendidikan khas bermasalah pembelajaran sekolah rendah dan menengah bidang pengurusan kehidupan. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.
  • Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2013). Kurikulum standard sekolah rendah pendidikan khas (masalah pembelajaran) pengurusan kehidupan tahun empat. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia
  • Majda Schmidt & Helena Creslovnik (2010). Learning habits of students with special needs in short-term vocational education programmes. Educational Studies. Vol. 36, No. 4, October 2010, 415-430.
  • Mok Soon Sang. (2011). Psikologi pendidikan. Selangor: Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn. Bhd.
  • Najah Kurama Ahmad Zuhdi & Roslinda Rosli, 2018. Pembelajaran matematik di kalangan kanak-kanak autisme: Satu sorotan literatur sistematik. Prosiding Seminar Antarabangsa Isu-isu Pendidikan 5 Julai 2018. Universiti Malaya, kuala Lumpur.
  • NASOM (The National Autism Society of Malaysia). Diperoleh daripada http://www.nasom.org.my pada 1 Februari 2020.
  • Noor Aini Ahmad dan Norhafizah Abu Hanifah (2015). Tahap pengetahuan guru pendidikan khas apabila mengurus tingkah laku murid bermasalah pembelajaran. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, Vol. 30, 73–88
  • Norhidayah Mohd Salleh, Noorhaneyza Mat Noor & Julianti Samsudin (2018). A survey of knowledge of autism spectrum disorde among malaysia polytechnic communities. International Journal for Studies on Children, Women, Elderly and Disabled, Vol. 5, (Oct.).
  • Noriati A. Rashid, Boon Pong Ying dan Sharifah Fakhriah Syed Ahmad. (2012). Murid dan Alam Belajar. Edisi Kemas kini. Selangor: Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.
  • Sanz-Cervera, P., Fernández-Andrés, M. I., Pastor-Cerezuela, G., & Tárraga-Mínguez, R. (2018). The effectiveness of TEACCH intervention in autism spectrum disorder: A review study. Papeles del Psicólogo, 39(1), 40–50.
  • Sasaki, M (2000). Aspects of autism in japan before anda after the introduction of TEACCH. International Journal of Mental Health, 29(2), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2000.11449488
  • Shahabuddin Hashim, Mahani Razali, & Ramlah Jantan. (2007). Psikologi pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publication & Distributor Sdn. Bhd.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1998). Theory practice and education of professionals. The Elementary School Journal, 98(5), 511–526.
  • S. Panerai, L. Ferrante & M. Zingale (2002). Benefits of the Treatment and Education of Autistic and Communicatiob Handicapped Children (TEACCH) programme as compared with a non-specific approach. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 46 (4), 318-327.
  • Van Bourgondien, M.E. & Schopler, E. (1996). Intervention for adults with autism. Journal of Rehabilitation, 62, 65-71.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/GCS-04267