Use of Contextual Teaching Methods for Hearing Impairment Students


The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of contextual teaching method in teaching comprehension of words and phrases’. This pretest-posttest design quasi-experimental study compared any differences in achievement between the two groups of hearing-impaired students. The students were divided into two groups whereby the experimental group was taught using the contextual method and the control group the traditional method. A total of 120 hearing-impaired students from eight schools in peninsular Malaysia were used as subjects for the study. There were 60 students in the experimental group and 60 in the control group. Data on overall proficiency were analyzed using descriptive analysis. The results revealed that the overall performance of the experimental group on all two language skills show a higher mean increase compared to the control group. Thus, the findings indicate that the contextual method used by the teachers was able to increase the students’ Language skills and had contributed the general academic achievement of the students.


Hearing Impairment, Contextual Teaching, Students with special needs, Special Education school, Special Education Integration program.


  • Abdullah Yusoff. 2002. Bahasa Melayu dalam kalangan pelajar pekak. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka Jun 41 (6): 36-41.
  • Abdullah Yusoff. 2001. Kecacatan komunikasi berkaitan dengan pendidikan, bahasa dan kebahasaan orang pekak. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka 40 (9): 29-36.
  • Bee, H. 1989. The developing child. Ed. Ke-5. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Bee, H. 1986. The development of oral skills to the hearing impaired children. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Clark, M. 1999. Language through living for hearing impaired children. London, Great Britain: Hodder and Stroughton.
  • Cohen, A.D. 1986. Mentalistic measures in reading strategy research: Some recent Findings. The ESP Journal 5 (2): 131-145.
  • Karweit, N. 1993. Contextual learning: A review and synthesis. Draft report prepared for the national assessment of vocational education. Baltimore, MD: Center for social Organization of schools.
  • Knight, P. & Swanwick, R. 1999. The care and education of a deaf child: A book for parents. England: Multilangual Matters.
  • Kuder, S.J. 1997. Teaching students with language and communication disabilities. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Lefrancois, G.R. 2000. Educational psychology: teaching psychological aspects. Belmont, California: Wadwoth.
  • Ling, D. 1989. Foundation of spoken language for hearing impaired children. Washington, D.C.: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.
  • Ling, D. & Ling, H. A. 1988. Habilitation: The foundations of verbal learning in Hearing impaired children. Washington, D.C. Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.
  • Lynas, W. 1994. Communication options in the education of deaf children. San Diego, Calif: Singular Pub. Group.
  • Moores, D.F. 1996. Educating the deaf: psychology, principles and practices. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Mischook, M. & Cole, E. 1996. Auditory learning and teaching of hearing impaired infants. The Volta Review 88 (5): 67-82.
  • Oyer, H.J., Hall, B.J.& Haas, W.H. 1995. Speech, language and hearing disorders: A guide for teachers. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Resnick, L.B. & Hall, M. 1988. Learning organizations for sustainable education reform. Daedalus 127: 89-118.
  • Wiersma, W. 2000. Research method in education: An Introduction. Needham Height, MA: Allan & Bacon.