Scientific literacy competency profile Students

Abstract

Science education means making students understand with science that they can apply in their daily life and job situation to solve the problems. This is descriptive research that reveals the scientific literacy competency of students. The research took place in SMAN 10 Padang. The research sample was 44 students. The Sample collection method uses cluster random sampling technique. The Instrument is scientific literacy questions from E-book Take The Test: Sample Question From OECD’s PISA Assessment. PISA questions used for this research consist of 63 questions. Based on the research found that scientific literacy achievement of grade 10 students in SMAN 10 Padang is 47,48%. This score is categorized very low. Then, through this research known that the low profile of scientific literacy competency was caused by some factors.Mainly, students were not habituated answering questionsthat consist of long question statement dan graph.

Keywords

Scientific literacy, low profile, PISA

References

  • Angraini, G. (2014). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA Kelas X di Kota Solok. Prosiding Mathematics and Sciences Forum, 161–170.
  • DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
  • Ayuningtyas.(2016). Profil Kompetensi Literasi Sains Siswa Berdasarkan The Programme For International Student Assesment (PISA) pada Konten Biologi (Kuasi Deskriptif Siswa Kelas IX SMP se-Kecamatan Kedaton. di Bandar Lampung) (Bachelor). Universitas Bandar Lampung
  • Akgul, E. M. (2004). Teaching Scientific Literacy through a Science Technology and Society Course: Prospective Elementary Science Teachers’ Case. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(4), 2002–2005. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED490576&site=ehost-live
  • Adolphus, Telima, & A.A.Arokoyu. (2012). Improving scientific literacy among secondary school students through integration of information and communication technology. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, 2(5), 444–448.
  • Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
  • Astuti, Yani Kusuma. (2016). Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unwir.ac.id/file.php?file=preview_jurnal&id=735&cd=0b2173ff6ad6a6fb09c95f6d50001df6&name=8.%20Yani%20Kusuma%20Astuti%20STKIP%20NU%20INDRAM AYU_GW_Juni_2016.pdf .
  • OECD .(2016). Results from PISA 2015. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA2015-Indonesia.pdf.
  • OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 result in focus. OECD Publishing (Online). Retrieved from http://www.oecd. org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-result-overview.pdf.
  • OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive Summary (Online) . Retrieved fromhttps://www.oecd.org/newsroom/43125523.pdf.
  • OECD. (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Volume 1. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/53/38484866.pdf.
  • Putra, Hadi Hamzah. 2016. Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Berkurikulum 2013 di Kota Padang (Bachelor). Universitas Negeri Padang.
  • Rizkita, L., Suwono, H., & Susilo, H. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Awal Literasi Sains Siswa Sma Kota Malang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional II, 2, 771–781.
  • Lufri dan Ardi. (2017). Metodologi Penilitian. Padang : UNP Press
  • Arikunto, S. (2008). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  • Purwanto. N. (2013). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
  • Diana, S., Rachmatulloh, A., & Rahmawati, E. S. (2015). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA berdasarkan Instrumen Scientific Literacy Assesments (SLA). Prosiding Seminar Nasional XII Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS, 285–291.
  • Hendri, Nofri. (2020). Merdeka Belajar; antara Retorika dan Aplikasi. E-Tech, 8(1), http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/e-techr

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/icftk402