Universal design learning approach to overcome mathematics learning

Abstract

The difficulty of learning mathematics can be experienced by anyone from elementary school students to college students. Based on the results of several studies found primary teacher students have difficulty learning mathematics, especially in basic mathematics courses. primary teacher students are prospective teachers so that if the difficulties of learning mathematics are not overcome will affect the quality of education later. Basic mathematics is a mandatory basic competency for students in universities. Research on learning methods to overcome the difficulty of learning mathematics in primary teacher students in basic mathematics courses is still very little. Therefore, this study aims to describe the nature, steps, and weaknesses of universal design learning to overcome the difficulties of learning mathematics in primary teacher students in basic mathematics courses. This research was conducted through a literature study. A literature study is a series of activities related to the method of collecting library data, reading, recording, and processing research materials.

Keywords

Universal design, learning approach, mathematic

References

  • H. Hafid, K. Kartono, S. Suhito, and K. Suhito, “Remedial Teaching Untuk Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa Pada Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman,” Unnes J. Math. Educ., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 257–265, 2016, doi: 10.15294/ujme.v5i3.12310.
  • J. Lithner, “University Mathematics Students’ Learning Difficulties,” Educ. Inq., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 289–303, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.3402/edui.v2i2.21981.
  • P. Scherer, K. Beswick, L. DeBlois, L. Healy, and E. M. Opitz, “Assistance of Students with Mathematical Learning Difficulties — How Can Research Support Practice ? — A Summary,” in Proceeding of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 2017, pp. 249–259, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3.
  • Marlina, Asesmen Kesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2019.
  • N. Soares, T. Evans, and D. R. Patel, “Specific learning disability in mathematics : a comprehensive review,” Transl. Pediatr., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 48–62, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.21037/tp.2017.08.03.
  • D. Penesetti, “What Is Specific Learning Disorder?,” American Psychiatric Association, 2018. https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/specific-learning-disorder/what-is-specific-learning-disorder (accessed Nov. 13, 2020).
  • S. T. Kane, S. Roy, and S. Medina, “Identifying College Students At-Risk for Learning Disabilities: Evidence for Use of the Learning Difficulties Assessment in Postsecondary Settings,” J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 21–33, 2013.
  • S. Klymchuk, T. Zverkova, N. Gruenwald, and G. Sauerbier, “University Students’ Difficulties in Solving Application Problems in Calculus,” Math. Educ. Res. J., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 81–91, 2010, doi: 10.1007/BF03217567.
  • J. P. Purwaningrum and H. S. Bintoro, “Miskonsepsi matematika materi bilangan pada mahasiswa calon guru sekolah dasar,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional MIPA 2018, 2018, no. November, pp. 173–180.
  • A. N. K. Rosyidah, M. A. Maulyda, and I. Oktaviyanti, “Miskonsepsi Matematika Mahasiswa PGSD Pada Penyelesaian Operasi Hitung Bilangan Bulat,” J. Ilm. Kontekst., vol. 2, no. 01, pp. 15–21, 2020, doi: 10.46772/kontekstual.v2i01.244.
  • Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka, Satu. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kemdikbud RI, 2020.
  • W. H. Rapp, Universal Design for Learning in Action: 100 Ways to Teach All Learner. New York: Paul H Brookes Publishing Co., 2014.
  • M. Zed, Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan, Ketiga. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2014.
  • C. N. Thomas, D. Van Garderen, A. Scheuermann, and E. J. Lee, “Applying a Universal Design for Learning Framework to Mediate the Language Demands of Mathematics,” Read. Writ. Q., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 207–234, 2015, doi: 10.1080/10573569.2015.1030988.
  • J. R. Root, S. K. Cox, A. Saunders, and D. Gilley, “Applying the Universal Design for Learning Framework to Mathematics Instruction for Learners With Extensive Support Needs,” Remedial Spec. Educ., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 194–206, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0741932519887235.
  • T. Hall, N. Strangman, A. Meyer, and G. Vue, “Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation. Effective Classroom Practices Report.,” Natl. Cent. Access. Gen. Curric., no. 2004, 2014.
  • E. M. Dalton, M. Lyner-Cleophas, B. T. Ferguson, and J. McKenzie, “Inclusion, universal design and universal design for learning in higher education: South Africa and the United States,” African J. Disabil., vol. 8, pp. 1–7, 2019, doi: 10.4102/ajod.v8i0.519.
  • CAST, “Universal Design for Learning Guideline version 2.2,” 2018. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/?utm_source=castsite&lutm_medium=web&utm_campaign=none&utm_content=aboutudl.
  • E. M. Yeni, “Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Di Sekolah Dasar,” JUPENDAS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2015.
  • E. Rosita, “Diagnosis kesulitan belajar,” Univ. Negeri Yogyakarta, vol. I, no. 09403241034, pp. 19–26, 2010.
  • P. Westwood, What teachers need to know about: Learning difficulties. Victoria: ACER Press, 2008.
  • P. Westwood, Commonsense Methods for Children with Special Needs, Sixth. New York: Routledge, 2015.
  • M. Jamaris, Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus. Jakarta: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia, 2018.
  • A. Kumalasari and Sugiman, “Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Kapita Selekta Matematika Sekolah Menengah,” J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 16–27, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/index.
  • D. Nugraheni, “Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Mekanika,” J. Pendidik. Sains Mat., vol. 5, no. 1, 2017.
  • R. Novita, R. C. I. Prahmana, N. Fajri, and M. Putra, “Penyebab kesulitan belajar geometri dimensi tiga,” J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 18, May 2018, doi: 10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.16836.
  • Analisa Fitria, “Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Dalam Menentukan Grup pada Struktur Aljabar Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI) di Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika IAIN Antasari,” J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 01, no. 2, pp. 45–60, 2014.
  • J. Afriadi, “Identifikasi Kesalahan dan Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika Pada Topik SPLDV,” Math Educ. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 231–243, 2018.
  • R. S. Setianingrum, S. Syamsuri, and Y. Setiani, “Analyzing students’ learning difficulties in algebra,” J. Mat. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–34, Jun. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2020v8n1a2.
  • M. Peters, “Using cognitive load theory to interpret student difficulties with a problem-based learning approach to engineering education : a case study,” Teach. Math. its Appl., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1093/teamat/hru031.
  • J. Schreffler, E. Vasquez, J. Chini, and W. James, “Universal Design for Learning in postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: a systematic literature review,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40594-019-0161-8.
  • M. E. King-Sears and T. M. Johnson, “Universal Design for Learning Chemistry Instruction for Students With and Without Learning Disabilities,” Remedial Spec. Educ., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 207–218, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0741932519862608.
  • N. Stylianidou, A. Sofianidis, E. Manoli, and M. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, “‘Helping Nemo!’—Using Augmented Reality and Alternate Reality Games in the Context of Universal Design for Learning,” Educ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.3390/educsci10040095.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/ICSAR-11513